Welcome! Wikis are websites that everyone can build together. It's easy!

IACR electronic publishing

The world of scholarly publishing has changed in reaction to the invention of the Internet, but in my opinion not fast enough. During my tenure as president of IACR we managed to at least secure copyright for publications in IACR proceedings and the journal of cryptology, but to this day I feel that we did not accomplish enough.

My concern is that our current model of using a commercial scientific publisher does not adequately serve the interests of science. In particular there are a large number of people who do not have free access to our publications, and it creates an insular society when our publications are not widely available to non-members. In the long term I expect that all of scientific publishing will gravitate to a free model of publishing, but the change may take some time.

The e-print archive has shown that it is easy to build and maintain an electronic archive of literature. If we apply our standard reviewing and refereeing process to an electronic mechanism, it seems that we would create a better environment for distribution of our science. I'd like to hear from others what concerns they have about a move to completely free electronic publishing, and how should IACR proceed in the years to come.


Latest page update: made by mccurley , Dec 24 2006, 2:15 AM EST (about this update About This Update mccurley Edited by mccurley

211 words added

view changes

- complete history)
More Info: links to this page

Anonymous  (Get credit for your thread)


Started By Thread Subject Replies Last Post
rcorin Electronic Reviewing and Refereeing 0 Jun 5 2007, 11:56 AM EDT by rcorin
Thread started: Jun 5 2007, 11:56 AM EDT  Watch
Moving to free electronic publishing seems to be fortunately the tendency, not only in crypto but in CS in general; let me point a nice article by K. Apt:
http://homepages.cwi.nl/~apt/ps/naw07.pdf on Arxiv.

What is also interesting is the mention on 'electronic reviewing and refereeing' of McCurley, and it reminds me another interesting read:
http://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/getArticle.cfm?id=1796
in which the idea of publishing the reviews themselves is put forward. It's in the psicology field, and not about electronic publishing, but I would certainly profit from
reading online reviews (perhaps optionally anonymized) of crypto/security papers.

Ricardo Corin
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Keyword tags: None
DiHo Electronic and print! 0 Jan 11 2007, 4:17 AM EST by DiHo
DiHo
Thread started: Jan 11 2007, 4:17 AM EST  Watch
I completely agree with Mr. Mccurley: for example, my first university does not have any access to Springer papers; it is often hard to convince administrative staff of the necessity of such access (and pay for it).

At the same time, books are easier to read than electronic versions. So we may try to publish proceedings giving no rights to publishers. Then every paper would be available both in elctronic and printed version.

Dmitry Khovratovich
3  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
Keyword tags: None
thepurplestreak Electronic publishing, of course 0 Jan 4 2007, 6:29 PM EST by thepurplestreak
thepurplestreak
Thread started: Jan 4 2007, 6:29 PM EST  Watch
This is Hilarie Orman. Of course the IACR should switch to electronic publishing with unfettered access.

I think that IACR will need to take additional care to preserve the electronic archive through replication and attention to drifts in data formats (it's now awkward to read old postscript docs), and we may need to print several paper copies for libraries (those that still have paper).

Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None
Top Contributors